This text presents a critique of Pavel Hošek's thesis, which asserts that reconstructing the historical Jesus is impossible because such reconstructions are invariably the researcher's projections. The author argues that while this objection appears valid on the surface, it suffers from selective application and flawed epistemological foundations. The core of the critique lies in the observation that no human being, whether deceased or living, can be truly reconstructed in thought. Any attempt to define another person results in a mental model or construction, which is necessarily a product of the observer's understanding and perspective. This trivial truth applies to all forms of scientific and academic inquiry. If Hošek's objection were applied consistently, it would undermine all exegetical constructions and theological concepts. Therefore, the author contends that the issue of projection is not unique to historical Jesus research but is a universal epistemological condition that should not be used selectively to dismiss specific historical investigations.