This critical response addresses a polemical article by the journalist Doležal, who attacks the legacy of the prominent theologian J. L. Hromádka, labeling it as "capitulatory." The author, who knew Hromádka personally, strongly objects to this characterization, regarding it as factually incorrect and misleading. The core of the critique lies in the condemnation of Doležal's style, which the author describes as a form of debased journalism based on vague accusations rather than concrete evidence. Doležal is criticized for selectively using quotes to launch attacks on figures such as Miloš Rejchrt and Jan Šimsa without showing any willingness for substantive discussion. Ultimately, the author highlights a significant paradox: while Doležal condemns Marxism for treating hatred as the driving force of history, his own writing is saturated with the very same hateful rhetoric he claims to oppose. The text thus calls for greater intellectual integrity and self-reflection instead of ideologically motivated attacks that lack both depth and historical accuracy in their assessment of the past.