The text reflects on the nature of guilt and responsibility during the process of reckoning with the past. The author argues that focusing exclusively on identifying primary culprits can be counterproductive, often serving as a distraction from more significant moral issues. While legal institutions should handle specific criminal acts, true guilt remains a matter of individual conscience and cannot be purely objectified. The document emphasizes that historical reflection must prioritize the future and the preservation of human integrity. Resistance movements were not primarily driven by the desire to name perpetrators, but by the necessity of addressing one’s own complicity and shared responsibility for systemic failures. The author asserts that only by acknowledging one’s own role in past structures can a discussion about broader collaboration be legitimate. Without this internal self-reflection, the exposure and punishment of criminal deeds remain mere rituals lacking genuine moral impact. Ultimately, the text calls for a responsible selection of past lessons to foster a future rooted in integrity.