This lecture from December 14, 1987, delves into Husserl's concept of the intentional object and Professor Hejdánek's interpretation, questioning potential misunderstandings. The discussion also addresses reflection and its "ecstatic moment," where truth is perceived in the future. Following a brief interruption (missing tape segment), the lecture turns to Bergson and the possibility of non-objective conceptual thinking that constitutes "intentional non-objects." It critiques Heidegger's notion that essential ideas can only be expressed obscurely, emphasizing the necessity of precision and productivity in both objective and non-objective thinking. The lecture further explores the relationship between objective and non-objective intentions, likening non-objective intentions to an "ocean" upon which the "dinghies" of objective thought navigate. It concludes by suggesting that precision is key for both forms of thought and that myth treated non-objective intentions carelessly. A later part of the recording seemingly resumes an older recording, mentioning a "second speech" or "right speech" and Iran as a potential source of inspiration for the Greek mode of thought.