This lecture critically evaluates humanism. The author distances himself from it, labeling it a problematic and flawed movement. A key point of his argument is the necessity to precisely define what is understood by the term 'humanism' in order to critically analyze this movement. Without a clear definition, the possibility of understanding its essence and consequences is lost. The author indicates that his personal stance towards humanism stems from a deeper misunderstanding or questioning of its fundamental principles, which will likely be elaborated upon further. The aim is to offer an alternative perspective on this traditionally recognized current of thought.