Hermann Lotze played a significant role in the development of pluralist and idealist philosophies in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as noted by Jean Wahl in his study of pluralism in England and America. Although Lotze consistently pursued a monistic philosophical system, his work served as a primary source of inspiration for numerous pluralist thinkers, including F.C.S. Schiller, John Dewey, and William James, and was frequently invoked by personalist idealists. Lotze’s thought emerged from a complex intellectual background; he initially drew from Herbart’s qualitative atomism and participated in the broader movement of returning to Kant. Furthermore, his philosophy was shaped by the Hegelian Right, particularly regarding the concepts of a personal God and the free spirit, as well as the direct influence of Trendelenburg and Fechner. This abstract summarizes Lotze’s philosophical trajectory and his paradoxical position between monism and pluralism, highlighting how his efforts to reconcile unity with individuality profoundly influenced metaphysical debates and bridged German idealism with modern Anglo-American thought.
Jean Wahl, Les philosophies pluralistes d’Angleterre et d’Amérique [1920], p. 41–1
Bradley a Bosanquet jej překládali; F. C. S. Schiller, Dewey, James jej citují, resp. se ho dovolávají; přispěl k vývoji pluralismu, přestože stále usiloval o monistní filosofii; dovolávají se ho hlavně personalistní idealisté.
Vychází nejprve z Herbarta (jehož označuje za kvalitativního atomistu); jako on je i Lotze určitým návratem ke Kantovi. Je však též pod vlivem hegelovství, hlavně pravice hegelovské. (Hledání osobního Boha a svobodného ducha; Weisse, Fichte [jeden z jeho přátel].) Dále pod konkrétním vlivem dvou filosofů: Trendelenburga a Fechnera.
1 Jde o výpisky z knihy: J. Wahl, Les philosophies pluralistes d’Angleterre et d’Amérique, Paris 1920, str. 41–42. – Pozn. red.