This text explores the concept of facticity and the historical evolution of the term 'fact.' The author highlights the word's etymological roots in the Latin 'facere' (to do or make), suggesting that facts were originally perceived as something constructed rather than merely given. In contemporary usage, however, a fact is primarily understood as an objective reality independent of the human subject. The text further presents Emanuel Rádl’s critical perspective on positivism, specifically his distinction between what 'is' and what 'ought to be.' A key concept discussed is Rádl's classification of facts into 'hopeless' and 'promising' categories. The author encourages us to question the nature and meaning of scientific facts whenever they are encountered in various disciplines. Instead of passively accepting empirical data, we should consider their potential significance and how human perspective shapes our understanding of reality. The goal is to move beyond a superficial perception of facticity and seek deeper connections and future potential within scientific inquiry.