This reflection explores the concept of the "inferior" (inferiorno) as defined by Slavomil Daněk in the context of religion. The author extends this inquiry to the field of philosophy, questioning whether specific topics can be identified as inherently inferior or subordinate. Drawing on the Platonic distinction between true and false philosophy, the author argues that nothing in philosophy is definitively inferior. Instead, the significance of various problems shifts according to historical and intellectual contexts; issues currently ignored may suddenly become acute. This perspective is then reapplied to theology, suggesting that no subject should be viewed as a priori subaltern regardless of context. However, the author concludes with a provocative thesis: in the present and near future, religion and religiosity themselves might be regarded as theologically marginal or even inferior. This challenges the traditional hierarchy of values within religious thought, suggesting a potential paradigm shift where the core of theology moves away from its conventional religious manifestations.