This text explores the concept of non-objectivity, asserting that it is not a discovery of a new reality but rather an acknowledgment of aspects of existence that have been historically overlooked or misidentified as objects. The author argues that since the Greek invention of conceptual thinking, human thought has biased its focus toward the objective facets of reality, even though concrete realities are never purely objective. Only mental constructs, such as intentional objects, can be considered pure objects. The persistence of this tradition necessitates the highlighting of non-objective dimensions in order to prevent further attempts at their objectification and subsequent mystification. Emphasizing the non-objective serves as a crucial intellectual safeguard until we move away from the habit of universally objectifying everything we encounter in our thinking. Ultimately, the term acts as a temporary yet necessary corrective to our conceptual approach, reminding us of the inherent limits of objectifying thought when applied to the richness of reality.