This text offers a critical reflection on Jan Patočka's thesis, which suggests that only nations suffering from a collective trauma tend to question their national character. The author disputes this view, arguing that the crucial issue is not the psychological presence of trauma itself, but rather the capacity to acknowledge the underlying reasons for such a state. It is suggested that many nations, including major powers like France, Germany, or the United States, possess significant historical reasons for a "guilty conscience"—ranging from colonialism to the treatment of indigenous populations and slavery. This perspective is further extended to religious institutions and Christians. The author distinguishes between the mere psychological experience of trauma and the ethical necessity of recognizing one's historical failings. Failing to realize these reasons for trauma is presented as a potential moral flaw. The reflection calls for a deeper understanding of historical responsibility and the moral weight of past actions across different societies.