This text critiques the scientific discourse that defines biological evolution as a spontaneous process while denying true spontaneity to individual organisms or germ cells. The author points out a paradox where evolution from inanimate matter is described as "spontaneous," even though science rejects the spontaneity of life's origin and labels mutations as random, shaped by external selection. The primary objection is directed at attributing activity to abstract processes, which the author views as a remnant of animistic atavism. According to the author, genuine activity and spontaneity are only possible for a subject—specifically, within event-based occurrences that are internally integrated into a whole. The text calls for a reassessment of the concept of "process" in favor of subjectivity and the internal unification of events. This philosophical perspective emphasizes that without a subject, true activity or spontaneity cannot exist, suggesting that the scientific description of evolution obscures fundamental ontological problems.