This reflection explores the concept of the Big Bang within the framework of the ancient Greek notion of arché. The author examines whether the origin of the universe should be reconstructed as a primordial unity that subsequently fragments into plurality, or as an immense plurality compressed into a single point. The text draws comparisons from Pre-Socratic philosophy, contrasting the early monism of Thales and Anaximenes with the later pluralism of Empedocles and the atomists. It also touches upon Leibniz's monadology as a potential precursor to modern astrophysical models. The central argument criticizes the traditional framing of the problem, which assumes a beginning within objective time. Instead, the author proposes that the plurality of beginnings should be understood as a continuous process of new emergences occurring perpetually. Without these recurring beginnings, existence would have long ago succumbed to nothingness. By rejecting a fixed temporal origin, the text advocates for a dynamic ontological perspective where emergence is a fundamental and ongoing characteristic of reality.