This critical reflection examines the concept of faith in the work of theologian Milan Balabán, highlighting his significant reliance on linguistic formulations and wordplay. The author argues that Balabán is often seduced by the aesthetics of language, which leads him to inadvertently fall back into the structures of Greek metaphysics despite his stated commitment to the Hebrew understanding of faith as a dynamic process of "passing through." The primary critique focuses on Balabán's use of terms like "foundation" (hypostasis), which introduces an element of objectification and reification into theological discourse. By defining faith as "grasping constants," Balabán is seen as succumbing to a static, noun-heavy mode of thought characteristic of certain metaphysical traditions. The text emphasizes the need to remain conscious of how language constrains our thinking and calls for active resistance against the ontological fixation of spiritual realities. Ultimately, the critique points to a gap between linguistic playfulness and the necessary philosophical rigor required to avoid naive objectification.