The text explores the ontological distinction between "true events" and "false events." A true event is defined as an internally integrated whole that encompasses its beginning, progression, and end, maintaining an autonomous unity independent of external perception. In contrast, false events lack an inherent unifying principle and are only integrated from the outside. The author notes that while false events are more common in everyday experience, human consciousness—driven by biological and historical factors—tends to project internal unity onto phenomena even where it does not exist, as seen in animism or childhood cognition. As individuals and societies mature, they begin to recognize that many perceived entities are not genuine wholes, leading to a philosophical dilemma regarding the nature and source of true integration. The analysis focuses on the norms of recognition and the structural foundations that allow an event to be considered a self-contained entity. This reflection challenges the observer to identify the criteria of authentic wholeness within the dynamic flow of reality.