This text focuses on distinguishing the philosophy of non-objectivity from traditional negative theology and philosophy, which has its roots in Neoplatonism. The author addresses recurring questions regarding the differences between these two intellectual approaches. While negative theology focuses on defining the divine or the absolute through negation (by stating what it is not), the philosophy of non-objectivity seeks to grasp a reality that is not objectively fixed, without necessarily relying on purely theological premises. The reflection analyzes the methodological and ontological nuances of both directions. The primary goal is to demonstrate that non-objectivity is not a mere negation of objectivity but a distinct way of perceiving reality and truth. The author defends the uniqueness of his concept and explains its specific contribution to modern thought in contrast to historical models. This comparison helps clarify the fundamental principles of non-objective thinking, which rejects the reduction of the world to a collection of finished objects and instead emphasizes the dynamic and non-objectifiable aspects of existence.