This text presents a critical analysis of the term "transcendental," originally defined by Immanuel Kant as that which precedes experience (a priori). The author highlights that Kant’s conception of transcendentals as being "prior" even to time itself evokes Platonic traditions and the myth of the eternal return, where the past and eternity converge. However, the text proposes a radical shift in perspective: instead of associating transcendentality with the past or eternal presence, it should be viewed in relation to the ever-approaching future. Under this view, the concept of "descendence"—a movement from above to below—would be more appropriate than upward transcendence. Nevertheless, the author ultimately rejects this new terminology as well, citing problematic spatial connotations and negative associations like decline. The document concludes by explaining why the terms "transcedent" and its derivatives should be avoided when describing "inner" or "non-objective" realities, seeking to move beyond historical metaphors that burden philosophical inquiry.