This text critically examines Aristotle's conception of motion and his concept of the unmoved mover. Aristotle posited that everything in motion is moved by something else, ultimately leading to a prime mover that remains stationary. The author highlights the inherent paradox of this idea, which relies on the paralogical assumption that the moving subject remains unchanged in its essence. This classical perspective is challenged by modern science, which introduced the principles of inertia and relativity, effectively eliminating the possibility of absolute rest. Particular emphasis is placed on modern physics and the discovery of wave-particle duality, where light and matter are understood as waves existing without any fixed substrate. The text concludes that motion should not be viewed as a secondary attribute of an object, but as reality itself. Thus, existence is not comprised of stationary entities that undergo change, but is fundamentally constituted by motion and change without the need for an underlying substrate, shifting a long-standing European philosophical paradigm.