The text explores the necessity of conceptual constructions and their fundamental link to intentional models. The author argues that conceptual thinking is inextricably tied to these human-made constructs, making it impossible to discard them without reverting to vagueness and approximation. Critique should therefore target the specific flaws in how models are constructed rather than the act of construction itself. Historically, these models have lacked a meaningful connection to temporality, often reducing motion to a series of static, point-like moments—a "pseudo-event" reminiscent of Zeno's paradoxes. The future challenge for philosophical thought lies in developing models capable of representing genuine event-based processes and temporality, which cannot be decomposed into or assembled from isolated instants. The author proposes starting with a simple schematic model of the "event" as an intentional non-object. By moving beyond traditional geometric models, philosophy can develop more sophisticated ways of conceptualizing dynamic reality, ultimately capturing the essence of becoming and time more accurately than the preceding philosophical traditions.