This text addresses the problematic tendency to name new phenomena prematurely, which poses a significant obstacle to human knowledge, particularly within the field of philosophy. The author criticizes the common habit of treating a name as a substitute for true understanding, where labels often serve as mere cover names for entities that have yet to be thoroughly studied. This issue is illustrated through taxonomic disputes, where classification frequently relies on a few selected characteristics rather than comprehensive knowledge, often ignoring vital functions in favor of superficial traits. In philosophy, this approach is considered especially harmful as it leads to misleading analogies based on initial, surface-level impressions. The document emphasizes that finding a name does not equate to knowing the true essence of a matter. It is crucial to move beyond terminological shortcuts and strive for a rigorous analysis of the phenomena themselves to avoid epistemological errors arising from the uncritical use of linguistic constructs.