This text analyzes the phenomenon of neopaganism by distinguishing between objectifying and non-objectifying modes of thought. The author argues that both traditional paganism and modern neopaganism orient themselves toward the sphere of objective realities, a stance that directly opposes the tradition of the Old Testament prophets and Jesus, who critically rejected such religiosity. While historical Christianity has often compromised on this issue, neopaganism resurfaces whenever objectifying metaphysical thinking prevails, whether during the Baroque era or in contemporary religious movements. A central theme of the document is the relationship between religiosity and human freedom. The author posits that no entity with an objective form can serve as a source of freedom. Consequently, paganism is characterized as an escape from freedom, as it utilizes emotions and affects to minimize the risks and uncertainties inherent in free action. By seeking security through the objectification of the spiritual, neopaganism ultimately weakens or excludes the existential uncertainty necessary for the exercise of true freedom.