This text reflects on the relationship between the professional community and creative activity in the fields of philosophy, science, and art. Starting with Ludvík Vaculík's observation regarding the increasing exclusivity of scientific and philosophical circles, the author argues that while some works are created out of an author's inner necessity regardless of a wide audience, current institutional frameworks complicate this autonomy. Science faces constant pressure from economic and political interests, forcing researchers to justify their work through external perspectives. The situation in philosophy is even more complex due to the inherently polemical nature of the field, which hinders objective evaluation within grant systems. The professional community often finds itself trapped between subjective biases and a lack of understanding from the uninitiated public. The author examines the role of philosophy in a broader social context and questions whether intellectual autonomy can be preserved in an environment dominated by external interests and bureaucratic rules. Ultimately, the text addresses the fundamental position of the philosopher in modern society.