The text examines the tension between Pascal's "God of the philosophers" and the "God of Abraham," critically evaluating Pascal's sharp distinction between the two. The author argues that philosophy cannot avoid the attempt to conceptually grasp religious experience, as a return to pre-conceptual thinking is no longer feasible. The analysis highlights differences between the Old Hebrew tradition, which prohibited naming the deity, and the Greek philosophical tradition, which critiqued anthropomorphic imagery in favor of conceptual constructs. A central issue identified is the nature of these concepts: traditional Greek ontology treats God as an intentional object, which is inherently problematic. The author suggests the necessity of a new type of conceptualization that departs from object-oriented thinking to allow for a more adequate engagement with divine realities without abandoning rationality. Dismissing reason in favor of sentimentality or traditionalism is rejected as an unsustainable approach to understanding the divine in the modern era.