This text provides a critical examination of the prevailing scientific method that explains higher-level phenomena through lower-level constituents. While reductionism maintains its relative validity, the author, following the thought of Emanuel Rádl, highlights the necessity of an inverse approach: interpreting lower elements through the lens of the higher. However, the inquiry goes beyond this simple reversal, addressing the inherent difficulty in categorizing levels of being. The core of the argument lies in a radical openness toward the emergence of the "new." The author suggests that true novelty should be understood as arising not merely from the "already-being" but from "non-being." This implies that the new is fundamentally irreducible to its predecessors and cannot be fully derived from existing states. Rather than proposing a definitive methodology, the text serves as a conceptual reminder to acknowledge and anticipate ontological innovations. It calls for a scientific and philosophical stance that respects the unpredictability of creative emergence and the irreducible nature of new realities in the world.