This text explores the nature and significance of the long-standing conflict between idealism and realism, or materialism, within philosophical discourse. The author argues that acknowledging this persistent dispute should not automatically be viewed as an inherent or a priori form of philosophical progress. On the contrary, the central thesis posits that once philosophy clearly identifies and comprehends the mechanisms of this conflict, it takes the first essential step toward avoiding and liberating itself from it. By achieving a profound understanding of the structure of this opposition, the thinker can transcend the limitations imposed by these traditional categories. The objective is not to find a middle ground or to declare a winner, but to achieve a state of intellectual freedom that allows philosophical inquiry to move beyond these historical constraints. The work emphasizes that the ultimate goal of reflecting on such dichotomies is to render them obsolete through a process of critical awareness and liberation, allowing thought to operate outside the rigid framework of these established philosophical camps.
[Filosofie a spor idealismu s realismem]
docx | pdf | html
◆ philosophical diary – record, Czech, origin: 25. 6. 1956
- This is a part of the original document:
- [Příležitostné poznámky, 1956]
[Filosofie a spor idealismu s realismem]
Jestliže si jednou filosofie uvědomila dlouhotrvající spor idealismu s realismem (materialismem), pak to neznamená, že v něm musí vidět nějakou apriorní formu filosofického pokroku. Naopak: jakmile si tento spor dobře před sebe postaví, jakmile mu dobře porozumí, udělala první krok k tomu, aby se sporu vyhnula, aby se od něho osvobodila.
25. VI. 56
### 560625