This text explores the nature of possibilities through the prism of Emanuel Rádl's philosophical framework, distinguishing between probable possibilities and those that "ought to be." Probability is linked here to inertia and relics of the past, whereas a true philosophical approach requires a critical distance from the given state and a commitment to rectification. The central theme is the idea of "universal rectification" (všenáprava), which assumes that everything in existence deserves correction toward what is morally and ontologically desirable. The author reflects on the relationship between the inertia of the past and the active pursuit of fulfilling ideal possibilities. Furthermore, the text raises questions about the origin of possibilities that "ought not to be"—whether they result solely from decay and inertia or represent distinct temptations and perverse passions. Consequently, the philosopher is positioned as a critic and agent whose task is not only to prevent a decline toward the worst but primarily to actively realize what is right, despite its apparent improbability within conventional reality.