This document explores the philosophical and linguistic nuances of the concept of reactivity, interpreted not as a mere mechanical reaction but as a deeper capacity or power to respond to external stimuli. The author defines reactivity as "responsiveness," representing the ability to adequately answer someone or something that addresses us or places a specific claim upon us. The text emphasizes that this capacity is closely linked to a process in which a subject is presented with a challenge that necessitates an active stance. A significant element of the reflection is the semantic distinction inspired by the English language, specifically the difference between the terms "responsibility" and "response-ability." This distinction points toward a fundamental human faculty of being in a dialogical relationship with the world and assuming the role of one who is capable of answering current calls and claims from others consciously and directly. Consequently, the text provides a brief yet essential insight into the nature of human interaction and the ethical dimension of the ability to react to the challenges of one's environment.
Reaktibilita a „odpovídavost“
docx | pdf | html
◆ philosophical diary – record, Czech, origin: 19. 2. 2013
- This is a part of the original document:
- 2013
Reaktibilita a „odpovídavost“
Reaktibilita je vlastně schopnost (mocnost, mohoucnost) reagovat na něco (nebo na někoho), tj. odpovídat na něco (nebo na někoho), kdo nás nějak „oslovil“ resp. kdo nám adresoval (přesněji: aktuálně adresuje) nějaký nárok, k něčemu nás vyzývá. V tom smyslu můžeme reaktibilitu chápat jako odpovídavost resp. schopnost odpovídat na něco. V angličtině se někteří pokoušejí od sebe odlišit „responsibility“ a „response-ability“, což míří stejný směrem.
(Písek, 130219-2.)