This text provides a profound analysis of the distinction between self-awareness and self-mythology. The author defines self-awareness as a dynamic and unfinished structure that takes shape through the evolution of linguistic communication. As individuals acquire mythical tools and subsequently logical concepts, they begin to construct mythical images of themselves, which the author categorizes as "logized mythologies." These mythologies can emerge spontaneously as part of the historical development of consciousness or be intentionally crafted to influence social perception. In contrast, the author examines the efforts of critical thinkers who seek an "objective" self-conception. However, the text argues that such objectification is fundamentally impossible and illegitimate. A subject is not a mere thing but a "non-object" that cannot be fully objectified. Attempts to grasp oneself objectively, for instance through false humility, merely result in alternative forms of mythologization. Ultimately, the text emphasizes the historical and inherently subjective nature of human consciousness in opposition to traditional objectifying thought.