This paper addresses the urgent need for terminological clarification in light of evolving philosophical conceptions of the subject. The author argues that traditional terms, such as the widely used 'subjective', no longer suffice for the demands of modern thought, necessitating the definition of more precise vocabulary. The text focuses on the term 'subjektní' (subject-related), which was introduced to Czech philosophy by J. B. Kozák prior to World War II. However, an analysis reveals that Kozák used this term interchangeably with 'subjective', leaving its specific semantic content undefined. Following the established existence of the term 'objektální' (objectal), the author proposes the introduction of a symmetrical counterpart, 'subjektální' (subjectal). The primary goal of the text is to justify the legitimacy of these neologisms and highlight the necessity of their gradual conceptual refinement. Philosophy is presented as a discipline that does not shy away from neologisms but welcomes them as essential tools for achieving greater conceptual precision and for better articulating the complexities of subjectivity across its various dimensions and theoretical applications.